Global Warming is simply stated as an increase in earth’s average surface temperature. The major causative agents are the greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide. This build-up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere alters the balance of earth’s atmosphere towards the hotter side. Greenhouse gases absorb some of earth’s outgoing heat radiation and reradiate it towards the surface of the earth.
The planet is moving from North Pole to South Pole, and everywhere in between. According to research, the average temperature of mercury has already risen by 1 degree Fahrenheit in the last five years. As people around the world start to realize the damage we are doing to our planet the level of stress, anxiety and depression is increasing. We need to take action now to save our planet and humanity
Oceans and deep waters play a very crucial role in global warming. They not only serve as a sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide but also produce it inside. About 1/3rd of CO2 emitted by human activity has already been absorbed in fresh waters.
The effects of global warming are the ecological and social changes caused by the rise in global temperatures, some are as follows:
- Melting of ice worldwide, especially at the Earth’s poles
- Swifter rise in sea level as compared to the previous last century. Sea levels are expected to rise between 7 and 23 inches by the end of the century
- Hurricanes and other storms are becoming even stronger and forceful
- Some of the most catastrophic floods and droughts are anticipated in the next half of the century
- Outbreak of infectious diseases such as malaria, dengue, swine flu, yellow fever
- Water deficiency
- Average increased in annual rainfall globally
It is very depressing to see what the human race is doing to our planet. It can lead to a feeling of helplessness and panic. Hopefully, we have some time left and we can heal the planet (and society) and tomorrow will be so much brighter!
The North Pacific Gyre is a huge, slow moving vortex triggered by winds and current patterns between California and Japan, where millions of tons of plastic garbage have gathered. Find out about the causes and environmental effect of this massive marine waste dump.
The North Pacific Subtropical Gyre is among 5 ocean gyres, large vortexes in the open ocean that are caused by wind-driven surface area currents. The North Pacific Gyre is formed by 4 ocean currents: the North Pacific Current, California Current, North Equatorial Current and Kuroshio or Japan Current. Flowing clockwise, these currents produce a massive circle in the sea between the west coast of the United States and Japan. Varying in width and depth, the speed of these currents ranges from 1 to 4 km/hour.
These winds push the water over which they blow, assisting to produce the prevailing ocean currents that also circle the North Pacific. These currents, themselves likewise subject to the Coriolis Force, curl rightward and more rightward, which brings them in long, gentle spirals to the middle of the North Pacific Ocean. The water moving into the center has nowhere to go however down. So that’s where it does go. It sinks, leaving behind anything that drifts, such as plastic. The sinking water, meeting the ocean floor, flows outward in deep currents, going back to the edges of the Pacific. Off the coastline of California, for example, the deep currents well up all set to carry even more garbage on its long spiral into the center of the North Pacific. How much garbage, actually, is in the garbage gyre? To come to any affordable estimates, some really wise individuals need to do a great deal of specialized work.
A Crowd of Information On Marine Garbage Patches
Known as the Pacific Trash Vortex, the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is an area of drifting trash approximated to be in unwanted of 600,000 square miles, or two times the size of the state of Texas, and weighing 3.5 million tons.
Have you considered
Approximately 80 % of the debris within the Garbage Patch comes from the land, washing down from rivers and storm drains, or being swept the coastlines by tides. The staying 20 % is from item containers that fall from oceangoing ships and spill their contents. Floating trash, the huge majority of which is plastic, is caught by turning ocean currents and accumulates within the North Pacific Gyre.
Let’s Continue This Analysis
The supposed Great Pacific Garbage Patch, also referred to as the Pacific Trash Vortex, in the North Pacific Ocean, estimated larger than the continental United States, is the most up to date marvelous shocker exposed by the media. The Patch is identified by extremely high concentrations of plastics, sludge and other debris that have actually been caught by the currents of the North pacific A comparable patch of floating plastic debris is discovered in the Atlantic Ocean.
There is a similar phenomenon, the Atlantic Garbage Patch, occurring in the Sargasso Sea, in between Bermuda and the Azores, in an area known as the North Atlantic Subtropical Gyre.
Big quantities of trash, clean up on islands within the North Pacific Gyre and shorelines locating it, such as those of Alaska and Japan. Stacks of garbage approximately 10 feet deep cover the beaches of some islands of the Hawaiian archipelago.
Marine debris positions a harmful hazard to marine and coastal environments. When they end up being or consume tangled in plastic debris, hundreds of thousands of sea turtles, seabirds and marine animals are eliminated annually. On the Midway island Wildlife Refuge, found on a remote atoll in the middle of the Pacific, 40 % of the 500,000 albatross chicks that are born each year die of malnourishment or dehydration, their stomachs filled with plastic debris that is mistaken for food. While it could split up into smaller sized pieces, the plastic does not biodegrade, and will stay in the ocean forever.
In addition to the risks provided by consumption and entanglement, the plastic likewise creates a toxic danger. The use of poisonous chemicals such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and the pesticide DDT has been prohibited or limited, they do not degrade and still continue to be distributed in seawater. These chemicals are hydrophobic, suggesting they do not dissolve in water, however, they are conveniently soaked up by oil-based plastic, concentrating them around a million-fold. Tiny pieces of plastic containing the toxins are ingested by fish or other sea animals, which are in turn eaten by bigger animals. The concentration of toxins is enhanced as it moves up the food cycle, a procedure called biomagification.
Plastic in seawater, unlike on land, does not Bio Degrade, it Photo Degrades, breaking down into tiny fragments small enough for fish to eat. The chemical compounds in the plastic continue to be and the contaminants are moved in trace total up to bigger game fish.
The issue of trash in the seas is not limited to the North Pacific; debris is discovered throughout the world’s oceans. National and international conventions and contracts have been carried out to lower the amount of plastic debris that ends up in the marine environment. The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is examining prospective cleanup techniques. Many organizations are devoted to recovering the oceans, including the Environmental Cleanup Coalition, the Algalita Marine Research Foundation, and the Ocean Conservancy.
Expanded waste decrease, recycling and reuse programs are crucial to minimize the amount of plastics that discover their way into the sea. Individuals can play their part by getting the word out about the international trouble of marine debris, lowering the amount of plastic they use, taking care to dispose or reuse of plastic trash correctly, and joining in to help with coastline or river cleanup programs in their area.
Many types of plastic are not reused since there wants market for it. The majority of communities will recycle PET plastic and HDPE 2 plastic. Some could likewise recycle plastics identified 5. This still leaves a significant amount of plastic which is not recycled – including all types of food or bundle wrapping and lots of plastic parts of a container (such as many covers).
In addition, while individuals may comply in the house, they don’t always do so when out and about. Convenience food produces huge quantities of trash – including plastic. Plastic bags are typically utilized for trash – and for that reason do not get recycled, however instead wind up in landfills. Quotes are that as little at 1 to 3 per cent of plastic bags ever get reused.
While reusing helps a lot – it’s much better not to have the plastic be part of a product in the very first place. A lot of reusing really requires a particular amount of ‘virgin’ or new plastic in order to have the resulting item act properly. So – every little bit of plastic that get recycled really results in extra plastic being made.
Ultimately – the very best bet is to get off the synthetic plastics and work towards plastics that are based on natural polymers that break down into elements that can be utilized by the environment. Even the best recycling program doesn’t accomplish that.
Learn more about how researchers are studying this phenomenon in ‘Voyage to the Great Pacific Garbage Patch’.
There are various incidents of oil spills everyday however, oil spills in very less amounts don’t cause much harm. The problem arises when there are various incidents of oil spills that are on a significant proportion, causing the spilling of millions of tonnes of oil into the seas, rivers and bays. None can forget the Exxon Valdez oil spill that occurred in Alaska, on March 24, 1989. One of the disastrous environmental damage caused by the world, the Exxon Valdez spilling lead to the disclosure of nearly 40 million liters of oil into the sea! No doubt, the casualties of the oil spill were the marine animals that thrived in that area.
Oil spills that occur near a coastline, cause more harm than the oil spills that occur into the open sea because marine life habitat is usually more dense in the field near the coastline than in the midst of the ocean. Oil spills can occur due to various reasons like, careless treatment of the oil pipelines spread under the seas, whereby the oil is transported to various countries. Also, any sort of accidental or natural disaster leading to damage of the oil storing tankers, barges, pipelines, refineries, etc., can cause oil spills. The oil spill effects on the marine life is decided according to the type of oil spilled, location of the oil spilled and the breeding season of the habitat in that area. The main problem with oil is that once it spills, it spreads far and wide in the ocean, thereby increasing the damage. When the marine animals consume the oil spilled in the water, the oil gets into their body and many die due to suffocation and poisonous effects of the oil.
Oil Spills Continued
In addition, there are other kinds of oil spill prevention tools: spill berms! These can be used in order to contain a spill if one should occur. They are arranged around the oil spill to ensure that the oil will not spread into sensitive areas.
I digress, lets move on.
Fur seals get affected by oil spills, as the oil sticks to their fur. Whales and dolphins remain safe from any external affects, as their slippery body doesn’t allow the oil to stick.
How Would You Have Known?
A sense of alienation among the community members, as the smelling ability of the seals and other marine animals is lessened or badly affected. This makes them feel lost as they’re unable to find their fellow beings.
Reduces the bird’s capacity to fly, as the feathers get tangled in dense mass of thick layers of oils.
Destruction of seagrass, coral reefs, and mangrove habitat, that are the main sources of ecological balance in the oceans.
It is a reality that oil is among the precious commodities and engine of the global economy, but it is equally harmful for the marine animals and wildlife, in case they be in contact with it. The oil transportation methods and the security measures employed while doing so needs to be strengthened, in order safeguard the precious marine life. While we cannot thrive without oil, we’re also responsible for the maintenance of the ecology. The world community should come together to fight these types of incidents and provide safety for the wildlife.
With global warming still in the bow and still a big issue, full of people are still uninformed properly about it! A lot of places are getting warm, forcing quite a range of people to head off to the beach or fan themselves endlessly. Many are still on the assumption that greenhouse gases. These contribute to making the planet warm, should really go. What they dont know is that the main purpose of those gases is to avoid heat from escaping into space, preventing the world from turning into one huge snowball! If they did nt exist, we would nt be able to live on this planet. This little article will talk to you about the most powerful greenhouse gases in the world. Some may even surprise you.
In the past few decades, people have led to the increase of the greenhouse effect. Industry, agriculture, and transportation, all participation in the additional amounts of the greenhouse gases being produced. These gases prevent the heat to escape into the universe, and reflect it again to the earth.
Water vapor Yes. Water. Right on upper part of the list. Water vapor contributes from 36% to 66 per cent of the worlds greenhouse effect. Its also the most abundant greenhouse gas! Concentrations of water vapor fluctuate throughout the world. Humans dont affect it directly on a broad scale. In addition, warm air caused by the greenhouse effect can carry more water vapor, amplifying the greenhouse effect further. However, humidity is constant. The net effect is overall positive, and also protects against the extra carbon dioxide.
Facts, Tips and Tricks!
Carbon Dioxide Ah, the gas that many people blame for heating up the earth. It contributes 9% to 26 per cent of the greenhouse effect depending on area. The worlds species and environmental cycles produce this gas naturally, up to twenty times that of what we contribute! Nature cycles the carbon dioxide through plants and weathering. However, human production has speeded it up more than nature can account for. Majority of manmade carbon dioxide comes from burning fossil fuels and deforestation.
Methane This gas causes 4% to 9 per cent of greenhouse effect. Human methane production mostly comes from livestock. By itself, it is an effective greenhouse gas, but it can transforms to water and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which makes it quite effective in warming the earth! If that is nt enough, it also turns into ozone, which is another greenhouse gas! This is why the number of methane around is has been more or less constant. It is why its effect is considered small since many who measure it don’t include what it turns into.
Crazy Things About Greenhouse Effect
Ozone This gas we all know and love as guardian against the sun rays, too, is a greenhouse gas. It causes only 3% to 7 per cent of the greenhouse effect. Ozone causes irritation to the nervous system at ground level, but is usually very light at that level, choosing instead to concentrate higher up. However, the concentration of ozone at ground level is increasing, because of pollution! This is especially concentrated in populated areas. It decays quickly to normal oxygen.
Global warming must be real! After all we have top scientists and even failed presidential candidates who says so. With 86% of Europeans polled stating that they ‘[feel ] that humans [are ] a direct cause of climate change, and 45 percent believed it could serve as a threat to them and their relatives within their lifetimes. Sixty-eight percent indicated that they would either strongly or somewhat support limitations on their buying and behavior in support of combating global warming’ it is only a question of the time for the skeptical Americans to fall victim to more government control. Those polled said it all, they would be ‘either strongly or somewhat support[ing ] limitations on their…behavior’ (Rohinsky) in order to stop a climate threat. This statistic is quite dreadful, not out of the climate threat, but as a result of the vulnerability such beliefs have upon freedoms. By analyzing the character of past theories, scientific studies, and the present evidence for global warming, it will become obvious that global warming isn’t a definitive theory, or even a legitimate one at that, and that the sole aim of such a theory is to allow government to regulate and control every aspect of our lives.
To clearly understand that the sole aim of the idea of global warming is to control us, we should look at some of the fundamental history of the theory. On June 24th, 1972 Time Magazine ran an article titled,’ Another Ice Age. ‘ In this article is reports from the top scientists of the day including Climatologist George J. Kukla of Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory stated that the coming ice age was on its way. With reports of 12% increases in ice and snow in the north of the hemisphere, temperature drops of 2.4 degrees Fahrenheit since 1940, droughts, cold winters and a full range of climate irregularities, the conclusion was that of a global cooling.
Are You Serious?
When we jump forward a few decades, the s almost no one’s even heard of global cooling, and global warming is the last idea.
All of a sudden, global temperatures had risen, the polar ice caps were melting, and the ozone is nothing less of destroyed. Once again the evidence is lacking, a lot of it is not certain and the only solution for that’s for the fearful citizens of the planet to give up some freedoms in order to fight against pollution, CO2 emissions, destruction of resources that may combat the warming… The list doesn’t end.
Global warming has caused the melting of the polar ice caps in the Arctic and the Antarctic regions. The temperatures in these regions have risen about two to three times in comparison to the average temperatures on earth. The polar ice caps have their own important role in the maintenance of the environmental balance. If the these ice caps were to melt, islands which are below sea level may be in danger. Cities like Shanghai and the island nation of Maldives are some places which would be done at the highest risk in such a scenario.
Since the theory of global warming has seen some challenges from a growing number of scientists, the name has once again changed. Now, as even the EPA’s website lists it, it is called ‘Global Climate Change. ‘ Global cooling was proven wrong when we all realized temperatures weren’t staying cool, global warming was proven wrong when the science didn’t add up (as will be considered further in this study), so the only solution for the agencies and government to look to was to rename the same wrong theories of the last with a vague, cover all name that is ‘Global Climate Change. ‘ While it hasn’t been proven global climates are changing, it is vague enough to cover any climate pattern that may seem irregular or unexpected, when in fact chance or timing may be responsible, instead of the tragedy of climate change.
Since global cooling has now been dismissed it isn’t needed to completely debunk that form of climate change, but for global warming, an alarming number of citizens around the world believe in it. In 2007, 82% of Americans believed in global warming, rather stunning considering the fact that a growing number of scientists are voicing opposition to the theory. In 1998 Dr. Arthur Robinson, Director of the Oregon Institute for Science and Medicine launched a petition for those who’ve degrees and science qualifications to sign if they’re skeptics of the idea of global warming. 32, 000 individuals with backgrounds in science signed the petition including over 9, 000 with PhD ‘s, far greater than the 2, 500 scientific reviewers the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change used in claiming there was a scientific consensus that global warming is real.
The consensus that all the loyal global warming activists and government officials always talk about just isn’t there. They want us to think that the debate is completed and now is the time for action, rather than continued research to actually prove it exists. With such a growing opposition, perhaps it’s important to actually examine the facts to see how the theory has come to be attacked as non-plausible and to see what doesn’t add up to cause such disbelief.
The current debate on global warming is not so much whether it exists, as it’s what’s natural and what’s not. If man didn’t exist on Planet Earth, would global warming exist? Perhaps if we all had a clearer picture about the effects on our everyday lives, we ‘d try to do more about global warming.
Diminishing glaciers, rising sea levels, dying coral reefs, migrating reduced daily temperature fluctuations, plants and animals, and more prominent and frequent ‘extreme precipitation events’ (a great amount of precipitation in a very short amount of time) are all suggested by today’s climate models as a result of global warming. The effects of global warming are accelerated and heightened by war. Should we be worried, as an escalating Middle-East war, even where not yet fought over energy or water, may give us an even shorter time than we have already to marshal resources to address the great threat of global warming.
To start off with, we should respond to the question according to whether the planet is actually warming. Warming is pretty much defined as an increase in temperature. Global of course means all across the globe. For global warming to be real, then we certainly need a warming globe. Common sense really, but then again, common sense might also indicate that the planet is cooling, not warming. For a decade now, 10 years, the planet has experienced cooling (Carter). 1998 was the last year in which warming occurred and since then, including last year the global temperatures have cooled and show no sign of warming this year either.
Temperatures since 2005 have dropped so drastically that all the warming that occurred since the 1980′s was canceled out. When a fan to the global warming cause hears these facts they commonly say,’ ‘how silly to judge climate change over such a brief period’. Yet in the next breath, the same person will tell you that the 28-year-long period of warming which occurred between 1970 and 1998 constitutes a dangerous (and man-made) warming’ (Carter). They also mention that of course some cooling would have to occur when you start tallying after 1998, since 1998 was a record high year. Well they’re forgetting to mention the fact that 1998 was such a record high year because it was a El Nino year. This is a natural cycle that leads to higher temperatures. As they forget to mention the fact that, we also ignore the fact that they too use the cooling of 1965 as their base line. Something else to consider is that the warmest year in recent history in North America was in 1934.
Weather has never been constant, so of course temperatures are going to grow and lower over the years. We should consider that ‘warming occurred between 1918 and 1940, well prior to the maximum phase of world industrialization, and that cooling occurred between 1940 and 1965. ‘ Periods of warming and cooling occur naturally, it isn’t global climate change or global warming, it is called ‘weather. ‘
Global warming as a process is thought to be very devastating in terms of its impact on the climate. ‘ Climate change’ is a phrase which is often use in conjunction with global warming. It has potentially catastrophic impact on the world under which we live. ‘ Climate change’ also covers global cooling. This can also occur as a consequence of human activity and greenhouse gases, and reflects a substantial change in the world’s climate, which could change our habitat beyond recognition. This could be characterised by unusual weather patterns, resulting in more frequent natural disasters. These could in turn lead to political and social chaos in the decades and centuries to come.
As we’re deceived and said that the planet is warming, we’re also being misled on evidence to support it as well. The most common myth is that the ice caps are melting and our sea level will rise. The National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) reported that there existed an increase of 9.4 %, or 390, 000 square kilometres of ice coverage in the year 2008 over 2007. Despite these facts we always see photographs of ice caps being split down the middle, suggesting out ice caps are outright being broken up and vanishing.
As ‘scientists’ parade around with their false facts of warming and melting ice caps, they can not fail to also announce how we’re destroying the coral reefs, polar bears are dying, and pursuant to a 2003 study ‘published in the journal Nature, colleagues analyzed numerous studies involving wild plant and animals for changes due to global warming. Out of the nearly 1, 500 species examined, the researchers found that about 1, 200 exhibited temperature-related changes consistent with what scientists would expect if they were being affected by global warming’ (Than). Considering the fact that scientists went into the study with assumptions on what the effects were (almost as though they were going to obtain the results they wanted no matter what they saw), they couldn’t scientifically prove what caused the so-called effects.
Everything we hear concerning global warming has to do with doom and gloom. Ice is melting, sea levels are rising, animals are dying, and life is changing, the only thing we can do to stop the chaos, is to take steps to end the warming. Despite there being no consensus and no real evidence that this warming exists, what the effects would be if it did exist or whether it could even be reversed, governments and agencies all appear to have ideas to curb our freedoms in the name of bridging the world. Why is it that every aspect of our life must be controlled? Not a single thing goes unregulated if global warming exists.
Global warming is a realistic threat to the existence of life on earth. The unprecedented rise in earth’s average temperature is a cause for worry. Moreover, the rise in temperature is expected to continue along the same rate, if some urgent steps aren’t taken immediately. Global warming has already affected the profile of climate in many places. Many of the recent floods, hurricanes and tsunamis are known to be a direct effect of this phenomenon. Global warming is also helps to the gradual rise in sea level in many places in the world. A collective effort on the share of all us is what is necessary to stop global warming.
The Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) that the Environmental Protection Agency (APA) released early in the year would give them the right to place a price tag on greenhouse gas emissions. Not excluded from this taxation of natural processes is our livestock. In New York,’ The tax for dairy cattle could be $175 per cow, and $87.50 per head of beef cows. The tax on hogs would upwards of $20 per hog,’ the release said. ‘ Any operation with more than 25 dairy cows, 50 beef cattle or 200 hogs would have to obtain permits’ (Poor). This massive tax upon farmers would cost New York farmers alone $110 million dollars a year, effectively harming the American farm industry, giving the global competitors an upper hand and leaving American consumers having to pay the cost (Gregg). Common sense economics will show that as price goes up, demand goes down, effectively regulating how many animals farmers own, and regulating what the consumer buys.
Taxing livestock wouldn’t be the only new regulations we see. A popular idea proposed by those internal affairs of the global warming hoax is the submission of the carbon tax. ‘ A carbon tax would be given whenever a molecule of carbon dioxide is emitted to the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels. Utilities would pay it based on their smokestack emissions and pass the cost to consumers in their monthly electric bill. Each of us would pay it when we fill up with gas, based on the substance of fossil carbon in the fuel’ (Schlesinger). Once again, in the name of fighting global warming we have a tax that would force companies to have to increase their prices to consumers if they want to continue running business the way they were. As companies are essentially blackmailed into investing their money in ‘green technologies’ to look for ways to reduce emissions, the consumer is left to foot the bill. This tax is nothing but telling companies what to invest in or telling them they must raise the price upon the consumer. It is a regulative policy that strips away freedoms from investors, consumers and companies to supposedly curb the carbon emissions that is causing a warming that hasn’t even been proven to exist.
Global warming although never proven, is already gaining land in the taxation side of regulation. The regulation won’t end there though. In California all new car models as of 2009 must display a label that states its ‘global warming score. ‘ While lawmakers claim it is suppose to be about public awareness, ‘a law endorsed by the European Parliament’s Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety would make governments put a monetary cost on the emissions of vehicles they plan to purchase, and add that to expense calculations’ (Greenbiz). The car regulation isn’t ending with just labeling society and adding expenses, in 2002 California led the way with forcing companies to produce certain cars. Assembly Bill 1493 is currently facing legal challenges from auto makers who’re quite honestly, not satisfied with having the freedom to manufacture cars of their choosing removed. They are now being legally forced to make cars that ‘reduce global warming emissions’ (California Clean Car Campaign) instead of making cars that consumers demand as the free market determines. The free market deciding how cars should be done makes sense, the people want it, they demand it. California, along with other states now considering such laws, have decided to strip away the free out of market and is now even regulating what type of car we drive.
To many paying a few extra dollars or driving a certain car isn’t a big deal as long as we combat global warming. Those ones usually don’t realize to what extent the regulation can go though. If the planet is in trouble, with ecosystems out of order, food supply being cut off, climate irregular, and entire cities vanishing beneath the rising water, there’s nothing that could be said to avoid the government and their agencies from regulating other parts of our life too in order to save us from ourselves. Karen Coshof, producer of’ The Great Warming,’ said in a Cybercast News Service interview,’ Population is the basic problem-the catalyst for [global warming ]‘ (Randall). Now, what is the way to battle the ‘underlying problem? ‘ The answer would be population control. Most are offended when they hear of the Chinese laws setting limits on children for families, with heavy taxation and fines for having too many children, but yet sections of the global warming activists in America advocate population control, and we can only ask ourselves how soon it will be before legislation is put up to a vote as well.
One of the most famous regulative policies concerning global warming is the Kyoto Protocol. ‘ The protocol’s implementation will require such heavy-handed regulation that Andrei Illarionov, the senior economic advisor to President Vladimir Putin who opposed Russia’s ratification of Kyoto, sees it as a recrudescence of the command economy. Appealing last week to Mr Blair to listen more to informed sceptics, he asked :’ Have there been any international agreements to limit economic development and development before Kyoto? Yes, there were two: Communism and Nazism. ‘ Many economists have determined that Kyoto would cost America billions of dollars, as a question of fact. Japan alone would be out $500 billion to cut emissions 12 times (only once) (Johnson). Through regulative policies that would determine what can and can only be produced, how it can and can only be produced, what jobs we can and can only have, what companies can and can not succeed, what investors lose or gain, it is comforting to know that Kyoto would have only reduced global temperatures by 0.3 degrees Fahrenheit. So much regulation to control global warming, and like the presence of global warming, the results of Kyoto will just not exist.
We have been raised to believe in global warming. It is in out schools, media, movies, and our professors love to espouse it. They would have us believe that global warming is, in fact, a scientific consensus, all while constantly changing the name of the climate theory, but yet a growing number of skeptics are speaking out and the evidence to sustain the so-called warming is just not there. When you combine that with the fact that everything about the theory of global warming just coincidently allows the government and other agencies to control and regulate all areas of our life, you have the operation of a fraud.
If global warming it to exist in our mind, they can raise our taxes, tell us what animals to own, raise prices on livestock, rise the prices of consumer goods, tell us what industries succeed or fail, determine what investments make money or not, regulate what we drive and take away companies freedom to manufacture based upon the free market, and even go as far as regulate our breeding. Not a single aspect of our life will be spared from regulation in some manner. We as a society have already said that we would be ready to give up our freedoms to fight global warming if it threatened us. They already have us confident that it exists, now the only thing left is owned by the threat to be highlighted. The science and history is against global warming, giving us citizens a wish that the world will open their eyes and see global warming as a regulative fraud.
- Elements Of Marine Garbage Patches
- Exploring Oil Spills
- Greenhouse Effect Methods
- Options Regarding Global Warming
- Clarifying Solar Energy
- A Real-world Discussion About Global Warming
- Oil Spills – Elements To Consider
- Advice About Global Warming
- Straightforward Advice About Environmental Activist
- Greenhouse Effect Options
- Marine Garbage Patches – What?